I promise I’m gonna get that PhD some day…that way all my philosophic pontificating on Twitter won’t be for naught.
I see Sony got its act together: www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-visi… 🎥
Look, I appreciate that Protestants and Eastern Orthodox love Tolkien too…but lest one forget he’s Roman Catholic. He’s ours. But don’t stress, y’all have got some good hitters (Eliot, Lewis, Vodolazkin).
If @binkytempleton sees these, I’m sure she’ll roll her eyes at my “curmudgeonly tirades.”
“Publisher of TL;DR versions of your favorite academic works. Our books make the perfect gift for your favorite pseudo-intellectual!”
Intercollegiate Studies Institute, I would have words with thee! I have found an original published version of Zimmerman’s “Family and Civilization” instead of that abomination of an abridgment that you released.
Lord, deliver us from the vain desire to subtweet.
Missing natural light during the day so much that you peruse Amazon.com for life-sized, photorealistic images of windows to put in your office is peak late-stage capitalism…or something
…or spend way too long composing tweets instead of praying Compline. Can’t be talking about “saint goals” with a beam the size of a Georgia pine tree stuck in my eye.
Sumpin offend your conservative/liberal feels then you read St. so-n-so who is all like: “A son of the Immaculate Heart of Mary is a man who is consumed with love and who sets on fire everything in his path“ So you search google for hd pics of their icon for your iPhone wallpaper
I’ve been waiting on this one for a while: youtu.be/qJXmdY4lV…
That quote comes to you by way of my favorite translation of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics: www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books…
Aristotle on Self-Sufficency
Our contemporary definition of self-sufficiency fails to account for our nature as “dependent rational animals”, thereby leaving us with an articulation of sufficiency that is functionally incoherent. Let’s see what ole’ Aristotle has to say: “We do not mean by self-sufficient what suffices for someone himself, living a solitary life, but what is sufficient also with respect to parents, offspring, a wife, and, in general one’s friends and fellow citizens, since by nature a human being is political” I leave you to apply this in consideration to the goings-on related to our Administration’s recent actions directed at our southern border.
High Flying Bird is the kind of film that makes me love cinema. Flannery O’Conner said that a story works when an author is attempting to resolve some impasse by embodying it in the life of characters. I believe this film works because it does just that—and brilliantly so.
I mean, I get no one is nostalgic for that again, but it could provide an interesting foil to some of the characters.
I just realized that “Stranger Things” takes place during “The Moral Majority’s” heyday, and, beyond the funeral in the first season, there’s no sign any of the families in the show are even remotely religious.
There’s gotta be a way to get my iPhone to autocapitalize “blessed sacrament”…
Well, that was a sorry excuse for a Croque-Monsieur.
Like the rappers of old, I too hope to “take it to the next level”.
Why include “virtue” in the title of this blog? Isn’t that a bit, presumptuous, arrogant, etc.? It may be, but let’s at least start by taking a look at the definition as it comes to us from Aristotle’s “Nicomachean Ethics”. Virtue is:
a state of character concerned with choice, lying in a mean, i.e. the mean relative to us, this being determined by a rational principle, and by that principle by which the man of practical wisdom would determine it. Now it is a mean between two vices, that which depends on excess and that which depends on defect; and again it is a mean because the vices respectively fall short of or exceed what is right in both passions and actions, while virtue both finds and chooses that which is intermediate. Hence in respect of its substance and the definition which states its essence virtue is a mean, with regard to what is best and right an extreme.